Removing mesh bias in mixed‐mode cohesive fracture simulation with stress recovery and domain integral

Summary To remove mesh bias and provide an accurate crack path representation in mixed‐mode investigation, a novel stress recovery technique is proposed in conjunction with a domain integral and element splits. Based on a domain integral and stress recovery technique, a maximum strain energy release...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal for numerical methods in engineering Vol. 120; no. 9; pp. 1047 - 1070
Main Authors Choi, Habeun, Park, Kyoungsoo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bognor Regis Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 30.11.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary To remove mesh bias and provide an accurate crack path representation in mixed‐mode investigation, a novel stress recovery technique is proposed in conjunction with a domain integral and element splits. Based on a domain integral and stress recovery technique, a maximum strain energy release rate is estimated to determine a crack path direction. Then, for a given crack path direction, continuum elements are split, and a cohesive surface element is adaptively inserted. One notes that the proposed stress recovery technique provides a more accurate stress field than a standard stress evaluation procedure. The proposed computational framework is verified and validated by solving mode‐I and mixed‐mode examples. Computational results demonstrate that the domain integral with the stress recovery accurately evaluates a crack path, even with a lower‐quality mesh and under a biaxial stress state. Furthermore, the cohesive surface element approach, with the element split in conjunction with the stress recovery and the domain integral, predicts mixed‐mode fracture behaviors while removing mesh bias in the crack path representation. Additionally, the condition numbers of stiffness matrices are within the same order of magnitude during cohesive fracture simulation.
ISSN:0029-5981
1097-0207
DOI:10.1002/nme.6170