Modeling and Detection Scheme for Zero-Dynamics Attack on Wind Power System

In a wind farm, wind power system is key to maintaining continuous generation of point energy. Since Zero-Dynamics attack poses a major risk to future wind farms, investigation on the effect of Zero-Dynamics attack against wind power systems has both theoretical and practical importance. In this pap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on smart grid Vol. 15; no. 1; p. 1
Main Authors Wang, Zhe, Zhang, Heng, Cao, Xianghui, Liu, Endong, Li, Hongran, Zhang, Jian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 01.01.2024
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In a wind farm, wind power system is key to maintaining continuous generation of point energy. Since Zero-Dynamics attack poses a major risk to future wind farms, investigation on the effect of Zero-Dynamics attack against wind power systems has both theoretical and practical importance. In this paper, we consider a scenario in which a wind power system is subject to Zero-Dynamics attack in power generation chain. Firstly, we transform a semi-direct D-PMSG into an equivalent circuit to establish mathematical model of wind power system under Zero-Dynamics attack. Then, we analyze and prove the advantages and limitations of Zero-Dynamics attack by divide the equation of state into a stable part and an unstable part with the help of system relative degree ρ. In addition, to better achieve desired attack effect, adjustments are made for Zero-Dynamics attack based on its limitations. Finally, we combine an Multiple Linear Regression (MRL) predictive control model with Byrnes-Isidori normal form to protect wind power system. The theoretical results were verified on designed small wind power system.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1949-3053
1949-3061
DOI:10.1109/TSG.2023.3279878