Motor Memory and Local Minimization of Error and Effort, Not Global Optimization, Determine Motor Behavior

Many real life tasks that require impedance control to minimize motion error are characterized by multiple solutions where the task can be performed either by co-contracting muscle groups, which requires a large effort, or, conversely, by relaxing muscles. However, human motor optimization studies h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurophysiology Vol. 104; no. 1; pp. 382 - 390
Main Authors Ganesh, G., Haruno, M., Kawato, M., Burdet, E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many real life tasks that require impedance control to minimize motion error are characterized by multiple solutions where the task can be performed either by co-contracting muscle groups, which requires a large effort, or, conversely, by relaxing muscles. However, human motor optimization studies have focused on tasks that are always satisfied by increasing impedance and that are characterized by a single error-effort optimum. To investigate motor optimization in the presence of multiple solutions and hence optima, we introduce a novel paradigm that enables us to let subjects repetitively (but inconspicuously) use different solutions and observe how exploration of multiple solutions affect their motor behavior. The results show that the behavior is largely influenced by motor memory with subjects tending to involuntarily repeat a recent suboptimal task-satisfying solution even after sufficient experience of the optimal solution. This suggests that the CNS does not optimize co-activation tasks globally but determines the motor behavior in a tradeoff of motor memory, error, and effort minimization.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3077
1522-1598
1522-1598
DOI:10.1152/jn.01058.2009