Understanding and interpreting CNN's decision in optical coherence tomography-based AMD detection

• Published in: European journal of ophthalmology Vol. 34; no. 3; p. 803
• Main Authors: Azoad Ahnaf, S M, Saha, Sajib, Frost, Shaun, Atiqur Rahaman, G M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2024
• Subjects: Aged; Algorithms; Humans; Macular Degeneration - diagnosis; Macular Degeneration - diagnostic imaging; Neural Networks, Computer; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods; Wet Macular Degeneration - diagnosis; AMD; CNN; SD-OCT; visualization; retina; macula
• ISSN: 1724-6016
• DOI: 10.1177/11206721231199126

Automated assessment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) has gained significant research attention in recent years. Though a list of convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods has been proposed recently, methods that uncover the decision-making process of CNNs or critically interpret CNNs' decisions in the context are scant. This study aims to bridge this research gap. We independently trained several state-of-the-art CNN models, namely, VGG16, VGG19, Xception, ResNet50, InceptionResNetV2 for AMD detection and applied CNN visualization techniques, namely, Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, Score CAM, Faster Score CAM to highlight the regions of interest utilized by the CNNs in the context. Retinal layer segmentation methods were also developed to explore how the CNN regions of interest related to the layers of the retinal structure. Extensive experiments involving 2130 SD-OCT scans collected from Duke University were performed. Experimental analysis shows that Outer Nuclear Layer to Inner Segment Myeloid (ONL-ISM) influences the AMD detection decision heavily as evident from the normalized intersection (NI) scores. For AMD cases the obtained average NI scores were respectively 13.13%, 17.2%, 9.7%, 10.95%, and 11.31% for VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, Xception, and Inception ResNet V2, whereas, for normal cases, these values were respectively 21.7%, 21.3%, 16.85%, 10.175% and 16%. Critical analysis reveals that the ONL-ISM is the most contributing layer in determining AMD, followed by Nerve Fiber Layer to Inner Plexiform Layer (NFL-IPL).