An Operational Semantics of BPMN Collaboration

In the last years we are observing a growing interest in formalising the execution semantics of business process modelling languages that, despite their lack of formal characterisation, are widely adopted in industry and academia. In this paper, we focus on the OMG standard BPMN 2.0. Specifically, w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFormal Aspects of Component Software Vol. 9539; pp. 161 - 180
Main Authors Corradini, Flavio, Polini, Andrea, Re, Barbara, Tiezzi, Francesco
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Springer International Publishing AG 2016
Springer International Publishing
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the last years we are observing a growing interest in formalising the execution semantics of business process modelling languages that, despite their lack of formal characterisation, are widely adopted in industry and academia. In this paper, we focus on the OMG standard BPMN 2.0. Specifically, we provide a direct formalisation of its operational semantics in terms of Labelled Transition Systems (LTS). This approach permits both to avoid possible miss-interpretations due to the usage of the natural language in the specification of the standard, and to overcome issues due to the mapping of BPMN to other formal languages, which are equipped with their own semantics. In addition, it paves the way for the use of consolidated formal reasoning techniques based on LTS (e.g., model checking). Our operational semantics is given for a relevant subset of BPMN elements focusing on the capability to model collaborations among organisations via message exchange. Moreover, one of its distinctive aspects is the suitability to model business processes with arbitrary topology. This allows designers to freely specify their processes according to the reality without the need of defining well-structured models. We illustrate our approach through a simple, yet realistic, running example about commercial transactions.
Bibliography:This research has been partially founded by EU project LearnPAd (GA:619583) and by the Project MIUR PRIN CINA (2010LHT4KM).
ISBN:9783319289335
3319289330
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-28934-2_9