Effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves of mobile phone stations on male fertility

• Published in: Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia Vol. 96; no. 3; p. 12595
• Main Authors: Gharib, Tarek Mohamed, Almekaty, Khaled, Abdel Aal, Ashraf Mohamed, Abdel-Al, Ibrahim, Deif, Hazem, Hassan, Gamal M, Haty, Ahmed, Alhefnawy, Mohamed Abdelrahman
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Italy 02.10.2024
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Cell Phone; Electromagnetic Radiation; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects; Fertility - radiation effects; Humans; Infertility, Male - etiology; Male; Middle Aged; Radio Waves - adverse effects; Sperm Motility - radiation effects; Spermatozoa - radiation effects; Young Adult
• ISSN: 2282-4197
• DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12595

To determine the effect of electromagnetic waves of mobile phone stations on several sperm parameters and the male reproductive system. This observational study was performed on 216 subjects, aged 18-60 years. Two equal groups of subjects were assigned to group A (study group) if they were living close to cell phone tower stations for at least 6 months and group B (control group) formed from individuals living 100 meters away from cell phone tower stations. Every subject underwent a comprehensive history taking, a clinical assessment, and laboratory testing. Regarding morphology index in the studied groups, the exposed group exhibited a trend of reduced percentage of normal morphology compared to the non-exposed group, with no statistical difference between the two groups. Regarding the total sperm motility (A+B+C) and progressive sperm motility (A+B) in the studied groups, the exposed group showed a trend of decreased total sperm motility and of progressive sperm motility in contrast to the non-exposed group, with no statistical difference between the two groups. Personal wrong lifestyles with exposure to electromagnetic waves have shown a trend towards a reduced percentage of normal morphology and reduced motility although nonstatistically significant compared with non-exposed populations.