Implementing hearing screening among children aged 0–59 months at established immunization clinics in Uganda: A multi-center study

• Published in: International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology Vol. 164; p. 111397
• Main Authors: Ndoleriire, Christopher, Ssenyonjo, Kagga Douglas, Fiona, Kabagenyi, Bisso, Fred, Nakku, Doreen, Okema, Louis, Mukiibi, Isaac, Nakafeero, Mary, Nyabigambo, Agnes, Matsiko, Sedrack, Seguya, Amina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.01.2023
• Subjects: Child; Child, Preschool; Cross-Sectional Studies; Deafness; Female; Hearing; Hearing loss; Hearing Loss - diagnosis; Hearing Loss - epidemiology; Hearing screening; Humans; Immunization; Immunization clinics; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology; Risk factors; Transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions; Uganda; Uganda - epidemiology; Uganda; Hearing screening; Transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions; Uganda; Immunization clinics; Risk factors; Hearing loss
• ISSN: 0165-5876; 1872-8464
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111397

The prevalence of childhood hearing loss (HL) is high in low and middle income countries (LMICs), with many of the affected children facing communication delays and poor opportunities for education. Despite the increased advocacy for childhood hearing screening globally, Uganda has no established childhood hearing screening programs. This study set out to introduce hearing screening services by non-specialist health workers at routine immunization clinics among children aged 0–59 months and describe the prevalence and factors associated with failed hearing screening (HS) in these children. A cross-sectional multi-center study was conducted at immunization clinics at three regional referral hospitals (RRHs). A semi structured questionnaire was used to capture data on socio-demographic, clinical factors and the two stage Transient Evoked Oto-acoustic emissions (TEOAEs) screening performed on children aged 0–59 months. A child that failed two stage screening was considered to have failed HS. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) for factors associated with failed HS. 1217 children were recruited at three RRHs, with a median age of 2 months (range: 0 to 59), half were male 52% (n = 633). Overall 45 children failed two staged TEOAE screening giving a prevalence of failed HS of 3.7%, of these 27 (2.2%) and 18 (1.5%) failed unilaterally and bilaterally respectively. Children of rural residence (aOR = 2.18, p = 0.027), of low birth weight (aOR = 0.42, p = 0.045), with relatives having hearing loss (aOR = 4.64, p= <0.001), who were admitted in hospital after birth (aOR = 3.72, p = 0.012) and a history of a childhood suppurative otitis media (aOR = 9.53, p = 0.015) all had increased odds of failed HS. The prevalence of failed screening is high. Implementation of childhood hearing screening by non-specialist health workers at immunization clinics using TEOAEs is possible and may be a necessary initial step in starting countrywide hearing screening in Uganda.