Range and variability of CBF in young adults: PC‐MRI and ASL studies

• Published in: International journal of imaging systems and technology Vol. 34; no. 2
• Main Authors: Su, Feng‐Yi, Peng, Shin‐Lei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2024; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Blood flow; Females; flow; intersubject variation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Males; Phase contrast; sex; Sexual dimorphism; velocity; Young adults
• ISSN: 0899-9457; 1098-1098
• DOI: 10.1002/ima.22986

Several studies have compared phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC‐MRI) with arterial spin labeling (ASL) in the same cohort of subjects. However, these earlier comparisons included subjects across a wide age range, which can contribute to increased intersubject variability. We compared the range and variability of CBF based on PC‐MRI and ASL in a group of young subjects. We also explored whether the comparison between PC‐MRI and ASL was dependent on sex. Thirty young subjects (17 females) were recruited in this study. The CBF from PC‐MRI (CBFPC) was calculated as the total blood flow normalized to brain parenchyma mass. The CBF from ASL (CBFASL) was quantified based on the perfusion kinetic model. The ratio between CBFASL and CBFPC was calculated. Females exhibited significantly higher CBF using both PC‐MRI (p < 0.05) and ASL (p < 0.005) compared with males. The disparity in CBF between sexes was more prominent in ASL measurements. A significant correlation was observed between CBFPC and CBFASL values (r = 0.47, p < 0.01), and CBFASL tended to be lower than CBFPC values (p < 0.001). This difference between CBFASL and CBFPC was more pronounced in males, as evidenced by the smaller CBFASL/CBFPC ratio in males (p < 0.05). The measurement of global CBF with PC‐MRI and ASL are correlated, but CBFASL exhibits lower values than CBFPC. As the underestimation of CBFASL is prominent in males, ASL amplifies the sexual dimorphism in CBF compared with PC‐MRI.