Online Trajectory and Resource Optimization for Stochastic UAV-Enabled MEC Systems

The recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and mobile edge computing (MEC) technologies provides flexible and resilient computation services to mobile users out of the terrestrial computing service coverage. In this paper, we consider a UAV-enabled MEC platform that serves multiple mobi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on wireless communications Vol. 21; no. 7; pp. 5629 - 5643
Main Authors Yang, Zheyuan, Bi, Suzhi, Zhang, Ying-Jun Angela
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.07.2022
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and mobile edge computing (MEC) technologies provides flexible and resilient computation services to mobile users out of the terrestrial computing service coverage. In this paper, we consider a UAV-enabled MEC platform that serves multiple mobile ground users with random movements and task arrivals. We aim to minimize the average weighted energy consumption of all users subject to the average UAV energy consumption and data queue stability constraints. We formulate the problem as a multi-stage stochastic optimization, and adopt Lyapunov optimization to convert it into per-slot deterministic problems with fewer optimizing variables. We design two reduced-complexity methods that solve the resource allocation and the UAV movement either in two sequential steps or jointly in one step. Both methods can guarantee to satisfy the average UAV energy and queue stability constraints, meanwhile achieving a tradeoff between the user energy consumption and the length of queue backlog. Simulation results show that the two methods significantly outperform the other benchmark methods including a learning-based method in reducing the energy consumption of ground users. In between, the proposed joint optimization method achieves better performance than the two-stage method at the cost of higher computational complexity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1536-1276
1558-2248
DOI:10.1109/TWC.2022.3142365