An enhanced grey wolf optimizer with fusion strategies for identifying the parameters of photovoltaic models

Identifying photovoltaic (PV) parameters accurately and reliably can be conducive to the effective use of solar energy. The grey wolf optimizer (GWO) that was proposed recently is an effective nature-inspired method and has become an effective way to solve PV parameter identification. However, deter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIntegrated computer-aided engineering Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 89 - 104
Main Authors Luo, Jinkun, He, Fazhi, Gao, Xiaoxin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 2022
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1069-2509
1875-8835
DOI10.3233/ICA-220693

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Identifying photovoltaic (PV) parameters accurately and reliably can be conducive to the effective use of solar energy. The grey wolf optimizer (GWO) that was proposed recently is an effective nature-inspired method and has become an effective way to solve PV parameter identification. However, determining PV parameters is typically regarded as a multimodal optimization, which is a challenging optimization problem; thus, the original GWO still has the problem of insufficient accuracy and reliability when identifying PV parameters. In this study, an enhanced grey wolf optimizer with fusion strategies (EGWOFS) is proposed to overcome these shortcomings. First, a modified multiple learning backtracking search algorithm (MMLBSA) is designed to ameliorate the global exploration potential of the original GWO. Second, a dynamic spiral updating position strategy (DSUPS) is constructed to promote the performance of local exploitation. Finally, the proposed EGWOFS is verified by two groups of test data, which include three types of PV test models and experimental data extracted from the manufacturer’s data sheet. Experiments show that the overall performance of the proposed EGWOFS achieves competitive or better results in terms of accuracy and reliability for most test models.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1069-2509
1875-8835
DOI:10.3233/ICA-220693