Controversies in Skin Testing for Allergic Rhinitis
Purpose of Review This article will review different methods of skin testing available for allergic rhinitis, emphasizing controversies and challenges associated with these techniques. Recent Findings The utility of quantitative skin testing has been debated in current literature, as has the accurac...
Saved in:
Published in | Current otorhinolaryngology reports Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 175 - 184 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.06.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose of Review
This article will review different methods of skin testing available for allergic rhinitis, emphasizing controversies and challenges associated with these techniques.
Recent Findings
The utility of quantitative skin testing has been debated in current literature, as has the accuracy of skin versus in vitro testing. Single- and pauci-allergen immunotherapy (AIT) have also shown good outcomes, thus questioning the use of large testing panels. Recent studies further support the use of standardized and recombinant antigens.
Summary
Skin testing remains a safe and dependable tool in the diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis. Newer techniques such as component-resolved diagnostics (CRD), recombinant antigens, and enhanced skin evaluation are being studied, but are still expensive and not widely available. Areas that require more research include designing standardized and recombinant allergens, the real utility of quantitative skin testing, the number of aeroallergens to test and treat, skin testing for molds as well as when to repeat skin testing. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2167-583X 2167-583X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40136-020-00284-9 |