X-Phi and Theory Acceptance in Political Philosophy
What is the relevance of experimental philosophy (X-Phi) to theory acceptance in political philosophy? To answer this question, the paper distinguishes between four views, to wit: (i) X-Phi as a systematic method to avoid or reduce biases in our moral intuitions— The De-Biasing View ; (ii) X-Phi as...
Saved in:
Published in | Res publica (Liverpool, England) |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
09.09.2024
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | What is the relevance of experimental philosophy (X-Phi) to theory acceptance in political philosophy? To answer this question, the paper distinguishes between four views, to wit: (i) X-Phi as a systematic method to avoid or reduce biases in our moral intuitions—
The De-Biasing View
; (ii) X-Phi as a tool for assessing the fruitfulness or consequences of various concepts—
The Fruitfulness View
; (iii) X-Phi as the best way to unearth the kind of moral principles we are interested in as political philosophers—
The Unearthing Principles View
; and (iv) X-Phi as a way of testing the coherence of principles with folk intuitions—
The Defeasible Reason (or Squatters’ Rights) View
. The paper argues that the first two views and the last—subject to some clarifications—describe important X-Phi contributions to theory acceptance as this is traditionally understood within contemporary political philosophy. In contrast, the third view goes too far in suggesting that X-Phi can supplant more traditional, in part non-empirical, methods. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1356-4765 1572-8692 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11158-024-09678-8 |