Co-Digestion and Mono-Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Steam-Pretreated Winter Wheat Straw in Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactors—Nutrient Composition and Process Performance

• Published in: Fermentation (Basel) Vol. 10; no. 8; p. 414
• Main Authors: Kreuger, Emma, Tosi, Virginia, Lindblad, Maja, Davidsson, Åsa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.08.2024
• Subjects: Acetic acid; Acids; Activated sludge; agricultural residues; Anaerobic digestion; biofuel; Biogas; Biomass energy; Carbon; Catalysts; Composition; Dietary minerals; Dietary supplements; Experiments; Fatty acids; lignocellulosic biomass; Manures; Methane; Nutrients; Particle size; Production processes; Reactors; resource efficient; Sewage sludge; Sludge; Steam; Straw; sustainable energy; Water treatment; Wheat; Sweden
• ISSN: 2311-5637; 2311-5637
• DOI: 10.3390/fermentation10080414

Wheat straw (WS) constitutes a considerable biomass resource and can be used to produce the energy carrier methane through anaerobic digestion. Due to the low contents of several nutrient elements and water in harvested WS, the use of sewage sludge (SS), consisting of primary sludge and waste-activated sludge, as a nutrient source in co-digestion with steam-pretreated wheat straw (PWS) was investigated theoretically and practically. WS was steam-pretreated, with acetic acid as the catalyst, at 190 °C for 10 min, ending with a rapid reduction in pressure. Process stability and specific methane production were studied for the mono-digestion and co-digestion of PWS and SS in continuous stirred-tank reactors for 208 days. The HRT was 22 days and the OLR 2.1 gVS L−1 d−1. In co-digestion, the OLR was increased to 2.8 gVS L−1 d−1 for one week. Nutrient elements were added to PWS mono-digestion at two different concentration levels. Co-digestion was stable, with a total concentration of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) at a safe level below 0.35 g L−1 at both OLRs. The higher OLR during co-digestion would require an increase in reactor volume of 14%, compared to the mono-digestion of SS, but would increase the annual production of methane by 26%. The specific methane production levels for PWS mono-digestion, SS mono-digestion, and co-digestion were 170, 320, and 260 mL g−1VS, respectively. Co-digestion did not result in a synergistic increase in the methane yield. SCFAs accumulated in the mono-digestion of PWS when using lower levels of nutrient supplements, and the concentrations fluctuated at higher nutrient levels. The main conclusion is that PWS and SS can be co-digested with long-term process stability, without the addition of chemicals other than water and acetic acid. The specific methane production for mono-digestion of PWS was relatively low. The effect of using higher concentrations of micronutrients in PWS mono-digestion should be evaluated in future studies.