Reliability assessment of systems subject to interval-valued probabilistic common cause failure by evidential networks
Reliability assessment of complex engineered systems is challenging as epistemic uncertainty and common cause failure (CCF) are inevitable. The probabilistic common cause failure (PCCF), which characterizes the simultaneous failures of multiple components with distinguished chances, is a generalize...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 3711 - 3723 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01.01.2019
Sage Publications Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Reliability assessment of complex engineered systems is challenging as epistemic uncertainty and common cause failure (CCF) are inevitable. The probabilistic common cause failure (PCCF), which characterizes the simultaneous failures of multiple components with distinguished chances, is a generalized model of traditional CCF model. To accurately assess system reliability, it is of great significance to take both the effects of PCCF and the epistemic uncertainty of components’ state probabilities into account. In this paper, an evidential network model is proposed to assess system reliability with interval-valued PCCFs and epistemic uncertainty associated with components’ state probabilities. The procedures of computing the mass distribution of a component suffering from multiple PCCFs are detailed. The inference algorithm in the evidential network is, then, used to calculate the mass distribution of the entire system. The Birnbaum importance measure is also defined to identify the weak components under PCCFs and epistemic uncertainty. A safety instrumented system is exemplified to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed evidential network model in terms of coping with PCCFs and epistemic uncertainty. The importance results show that both the epistemic uncertainty associated with components’ state probabilities and PCCFs have impact on components’ importance. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1064-1246 1875-8967 |
DOI: | 10.3233/JIFS-18290 |