Diverse Needling Methods for Dry Eye Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objective: To explore a proper acupuncture treatment protocol for dry eye syndrome (DES), by comparing the therapeutic effects between ordinary acupuncture and electroacupuncture (EA). Methods: Forty-seven eligible subjects with DES were randomized into an acupuncture group (n=23) and an EA group (n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of acupuncture and tuina science Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 84 - 88
Main Authors Guo, Meng-hu, Cui, En-cao, Li, Xin-yuan, Zong, Lei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian 01.04.2013
Springer Nature B.V
Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200437, China
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To explore a proper acupuncture treatment protocol for dry eye syndrome (DES), by comparing the therapeutic effects between ordinary acupuncture and electroacupuncture (EA). Methods: Forty-seven eligible subjects with DES were randomized into an acupuncture group (n=23) and an EA group (n=24). With the same acupoint formula, the acupuncture group was treated with ordinary acupuncture, and the EA group was treated with ordinary acupuncture plus electrical stimulation. After a treatment course, eye symptom score, Schirmer test (SIT), Break-up Time (BUT) of tear film, Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were adopted in evaluation and comparison of the two groups. Results: The total effective rate was 79.2% in the EA group versus 56.5% in the acupuncture group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). After treatment, both groups had marked improvements in eye symptom score, SIT, BUT, CFS, and VAS values (P〈0.001); the EA group was better than acupuncture group in improving eye symptom score and SIT value (both P〈0.05); the differences were insignificant in comparing VAS, BUT and CFS results between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion: Both EA and ordinary acupuncture are effective in treating DES, but EA is better than ordinary acupuncture in improving eye symptom and SIT score.
Bibliography:Objective: To explore a proper acupuncture treatment protocol for dry eye syndrome (DES), by comparing the therapeutic effects between ordinary acupuncture and electroacupuncture (EA). Methods: Forty-seven eligible subjects with DES were randomized into an acupuncture group (n=23) and an EA group (n=24). With the same acupoint formula, the acupuncture group was treated with ordinary acupuncture, and the EA group was treated with ordinary acupuncture plus electrical stimulation. After a treatment course, eye symptom score, Schirmer test (SIT), Break-up Time (BUT) of tear film, Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were adopted in evaluation and comparison of the two groups. Results: The total effective rate was 79.2% in the EA group versus 56.5% in the acupuncture group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). After treatment, both groups had marked improvements in eye symptom score, SIT, BUT, CFS, and VAS values (P〈0.001); the EA group was better than acupuncture group in improving eye symptom score and SIT value (both P〈0.05); the differences were insignificant in comparing VAS, BUT and CFS results between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion: Both EA and ordinary acupuncture are effective in treating DES, but EA is better than ordinary acupuncture in improving eye symptom and SIT score.
Acupuncture Therapy; Electroacupuncture; Dry Eye Syndromes;Randomized Controlled Trial
31-1908/R
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ISSN:1672-3597
1993-0399
DOI:10.1007/s11726-013-0662-9