Barriers to incorporating ecosystem services in coastal conservation practice: the case of blue carbon

• Published in: Ecology and society Vol. 26; no. 4; p. 40
• Main Authors: Strong, Aaron L., Ardoin, Nicole M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ottawa Resilience Alliance 01.12.2021
• Subjects: Barriers; Carbon; Case studies; climate mitigation; coasts; Community organizations; Conservation; Conservation organizations; Conservation practices; Decision making; Ecosystem services; Ecosystems; Environmental governance; Environmental policy; Governance; institutions; Localism; Motivation; Organizations; Policy making; sense of place; Services; social-ecological systems; Sustainability; Typology; United States > US
• ISSN: 1708-3087; 1708-3087
• DOI: 10.5751/ES-12741-260440

Over the past decade, the ecosystem services frame has had a tremendous and increasing influence on environmental governance and decision making. Yet the ecosystem services governance literature reveals key tensions related to scale, stakeholder identification and engagement, knowledge of ecosystem services, and dissemination of the framework. Those challenges remain unresolved in policy makers', nonprofit managers', and even researchers' understanding of how this emergent framework functions when put into practice. Understanding empirically the factors that influence uptake of this concept by stakeholders in a variety of contexts remains a key gap in the literature. Using coastal blue carbon as a case study, we assess barriers to and enabling factors for the uptake of the ecosystem service concept among stakeholders: local, place-based coastal conservation organizations. Through semi-structured interviews with individuals of coastal conservation organizations in two U.S. regions, we collected data that, upon analysis, suggest a typology of five barriers to action on blue carbon. Those are barriers related to (1) structural issues (time, finances, and access to other resources); (2) expertise and/or technical abilities; (3) politics and political beliefs; (4) personal motivation and identity; and (5) localism. Our results also suggest two necessary conditions for action within a local organization: a connection to a research laboratory and an awareness of, or connection to, a national backbone organization. As a whole, our work makes clear that, in the United States, the concept of ecosystem services remains far from the mainstream for local, place-based coastal conservation organizations. We also find specific challenges to realizing the promises of this emergent framework.