Hydrate Deposition Model and Flow Assurance Technology in Gas-Dominant Pipeline Transportation Systems: A Review

With the exploration and development of natural gas gradually extended to the deep sea, low-temperature and high-pressure environmental conditions and long-distance transportation make flow assurance engineers have to consider the impact of the formation and blockage of natural gas hydrates on the f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergy & fuels Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 1747 - 1775
Main Authors Zhang, Shu-wei, Shang, Li-yan, Zhou, Li, Lv, Zhen-bo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 17.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:With the exploration and development of natural gas gradually extended to the deep sea, low-temperature and high-pressure environmental conditions and long-distance transportation make flow assurance engineers have to consider the impact of the formation and blockage of natural gas hydrates on the flow stability in the pipeline. Therefore, an inadequate understanding of the hydrate formation and plugging mechanism in a gas-rich (gas-dominant) system has become a serious obstacle to the prediction of hydrate formation and implementation of blocking prevention and control strategies. To this end, this review has conducted a comprehensive review of recent experimental investigations into hydrate formation and blockage in gas-rich systems in flow loop devices, and the physical models to characterize the clogging mechanism of hydrates established by previous scholars were summarized. In addition, the three flow patterns of the gas-rich system were divided, and the hydrate deposition mechanism corresponding to each flow pattern and the prediction model of the deposition layer thickness was summarized. Eventually, the natural gas hydrate mitigation and prophylaxis and restrain strategies used in the process of deep-sea natural gas transportation were summarized, including advantages and disadvantages of natural gas dehydration, changing the gas flow rate, and adding chemical inhibitors. The advantages and feasibility of an under-inhibited system and changing the gas flow rate for the management and prevention of hydrate blockage were emphasized. The conclusion can improve the safety index of natural gas development and transportation operations and reduce the output loss of natural gas energy and economic loss of hydrate anti-blocking.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0887-0624
1520-5029
1520-5029
DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03812