Acute Coronary Syndrome in Indian Subcontinent Patients Residing in the Middle East: Results From Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events II

We compared baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and in-hospital outcomes between Middle Eastern Arabs and Indian subcontinent patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Of the 7930 patients enrolled in Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events II (RACE II), 23% (n = 1669) were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAngiology Vol. 66; no. 9; p. 818
Main Authors Panduranga, Prashanth, Sulaiman, Kadhim J, Al-Zakwani, Ibrahim, Alhabib, Khalid F, Hersi, Ahmad, Suwaidi, Jassim Al, Alsheikh-Ali, Alawi A, Almahmeed, Wael, Saif, Shukri Al, Al-Faleh, Hussam, Al-Lawati, Jawad, Asaad, Nidal, Al-Motarreb, Ahmed, Amin, Haitham
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.10.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We compared baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and in-hospital outcomes between Middle Eastern Arabs and Indian subcontinent patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Of the 7930 patients enrolled in Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events II (RACE II), 23% (n = 1669) were from the Indian subcontinent. The Indian subcontinent patients, in comparison with the Middle Eastern Arabs, were younger (49 vs 60 years; P < .001), more were males (96% vs 80%; P < .001), had lower proportion of higher Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score (8% vs 27%; P < .001), and less likely to be associated with diabetes (34% vs 42%; P < .001), hypertension (36% vs 51%; P < .001), and hyperlipidemia (29% vs 39%; P < .001) but more likely to be smokers (55% vs 29%; P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, the Middle Eastern Arabs were less likely to be associated with in-hospital congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-0.86; P = .003) but more likely to be associated with recurrent ischemia (OR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03-1.71; P = .026) when compared to the Indian subcontinent patients. Despite the baseline differences, there were largely no significant differences in in-hospital outcomes between the Indians and the Middle Eastern Arabs.
ISSN:1940-1574
DOI:10.1177/0003319714556812