Safety of brand name to generic substitution of lacosamide in patients with epilepsy - A prospective single-center observational study

Lacosamide is a widely used third-generation antiseizure medication. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the safety of substituting brand-name lacosamide with its generic version. This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes associated with switching from the brand-name to the gene...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSeizure (London, England) Vol. 111; pp. 203 - 205
Main Authors Bosak, Magdalena, Woźniak, Martyna, Kasprzycki, Maciej, Słowik, Agnieszka
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Lacosamide is a widely used third-generation antiseizure medication. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the safety of substituting brand-name lacosamide with its generic version. This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes associated with switching from the brand-name to the generic form of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with epilepsy. This prospective observational study involved patients undergoing treatment with LCM at the university epilepsy clinic. In 2018, the price of the brand-name LCM in Poland increased up to 110-fold compared to generic products. Anticipating that most patients would opt to switch to the generic formulations due to financial constraints, we chose to follow up them prospectively to assess the safety of transitioning from the brand-name to the generic form of LCM. A total of 81 patients, aged 18–62 years, diagnosed with focal epilepsy and undergoing LCM treatment at our institution, decided to switch from the brand-name (Vimpat) to generic variations (Lacosamide TEVA, Lacosamide Glenmark, and Lacosamide Accord). Following the switch, no significant difference was observed in terms of seizure frequency before and after (p = 0.55, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Subsequently, adverse events were recorded in four patients (4.9%) during the initial follow-up visit post-switch, including somnolence (2 patients) and dizziness (2 patients). Notably, all adverse events resolved by the second follow-up visit without necessitating treatment modification. Importantly, no patient switched back to brand-name medication The generic substitution of lacosamide was found to be generally safe in our study. Nonetheless, to confirm our findings, larger prospective studies are required.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1059-1311
1532-2688
DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2023.09.001