Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Standard Care Among Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results From the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Trial (Cohort B)

In patients with severe aortic stenosis who cannot have surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to improve survival and quality of life compared with standard therapy, but the costs and cost-effectiveness of this strategy are not yet known. The PARTNER trial randomized...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 125; no. 9; pp. 1102 - 1109
Main Authors REYNOLDS, Matthew R, MAGNUSON, Elizabeth A, SMITH, Craig R, LEON, Martin B, COHEN, David J, KAIJUN WANG, YANG LEI, VILAIN, Katherine, WALCZAK, Joshua, KODALI, Susheel K, LASALA, John M, O'NEILL, William W, DAVIDSON, Charles J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 06.03.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In patients with severe aortic stenosis who cannot have surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to improve survival and quality of life compared with standard therapy, but the costs and cost-effectiveness of this strategy are not yet known. The PARTNER trial randomized patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis who were not candidates for surgery to TAVR (n=179) or standard therapy (n=179). Empirical data regarding survival, quality of life, medical resource use, and hospital costs were collected during the trial and used to project life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and lifetime medical care costs to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of TAVR from a US perspective. For patients treated with TAVR, mean costs for the initial procedure and hospitalization were $42 806 and $78 542, respectively. Follow-up costs through 12 months were lower with TAVR ($29 289 versus $53 621) because of reduced hospitalization rates, but cumulative 1-year costs remained higher ($106 076 versus $53 621). We projected that over a patient's lifetime, TAVR would increase discounted life expectancy by 1.6 years (1.3 quality-adjusted life-years) at an incremental cost of $79 837. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for TAVR was thus estimated at $50 200 per year of life gained or $61 889 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. These results were stable across a broad range of uncertainty and sensitivity analyses. For patients with severe aortic stenosis who are not candidates for surgery, TAVR increases life expectancy at an incremental cost per life-year gained well within accepted values for commonly used cardiovascular technologies. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00530894.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.054072