Research on the mechanism of improving the energy-saving effect of green credit policy: green washing behavior and financial supervision

In recent years, governments have made many efforts to achieve energy conservation goals. As the most important green financial instrument in China, how to improve the energy-saving effect of green credit (GC) policy has become a topic of great concern. Based on the urban panel data from 2013 to 202...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergy (Oxford) Vol. 327; p. 136485
Main Authors Pan, Ting, Lin, Boqiang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In recent years, governments have made many efforts to achieve energy conservation goals. As the most important green financial instrument in China, how to improve the energy-saving effect of green credit (GC) policy has become a topic of great concern. Based on the urban panel data from 2013 to 2022, this paper uses two-stage least squares (2SLS) method to investigate the energy-saving effect of GC. The study found: (1) GC can effectively reduce urban energy consumption (EC). (2) There is a certain difference between the energy-saving effect of GC and the theoretical energy-saving effect disclosed by bank ESG, indicating that the actual energy-saving effect of GC is not as expected. (3) Mechanism analysis found that poor supervision of financial institutions and green washing behavior are the main reasons for reducing the energy-saving effect of GC. (4) Heterogeneity analysis found that by improving the level of financial development and environmental law enforcement, energy saving effects can be effectively improved. This paper provides an effective policy reference for promoting the development of GC and urban energy saving and consumption reduction. •Green credit can effectively promote urban energy conservation.•The actual energy savings of green credit are lower than banks' ESG expectations.•Weak financial supervision and green washing behavior are the main reasons.•There is heterogeneity in environmental control and financial development.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0360-5442
DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.136485