Rotation of liquid‐preserved artificial insemination doses on roller benches affects sperm quality during storage in stallions

• Published in: Reproduction in domestic animals Vol. 58; no. 10; pp. 1413 - 1419
• Main Authors: Dierberger, H, Pieper, L, Jung, M, Schulze, M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2023
• Subjects: Artificial insemination; Dilution; Fertility; Flow cytometry; Horses; Parameters; Rotating liquids; Rotation; Semen; Sperm; Spermatozoa; Statistical analysis; Statistical models
• ISSN: 0936-6768; 1439-0531
• DOI: 10.1111/rda.14456

Abstract Appropriate stallion semen handling is of great importance in equine artificial insemination (AI) industry. Optimal treatment of AI doses is aiming for best sperm preservation by excluding strong environmental influences and adding media that favour sperm survival. One method widely used in stallion sperm handling is the rotation of liquid‐preserved semen samples on roller benches during storage. As previous studies in boars give rise to the fact that rotation should not be considered beneficial for spermatozoa anymore, the present study investigated the influence of continuous rotation of diluted stallion AI portions on sperm quality. Ejaculates ( n  = 15) were collected at a German AI centre and diluted with the two extenders EquiPlus and Gent (Minitüb GmbH) to a final concentration of 50 × 10 6  sperm/mL. Afterwards, samples were placed separately on roller benches at 5°C in the dark, obtaining a rotation frequency of 5 revolutions per minute (rpm) and 36 rpm for four consecutive days following a split‐sample design. Both groups were analysed daily in comparison to a control group (0 rpm) with an extended spectrum of spermatological methods including computer‐assisted sperm analysis and flow cytometry. Statistical analyses were based on the calculation of generalized linear mixed models for each sperm parameter. The research revealed a decrease in sperm quality parameters of rotated samples compared to non‐rotated control groups, visible in total sperm motility ( p  < .001), decreased thermo‐resistance ( p  < .01) and a drop in pH ( p  < .001). Interestingly, no differences ( p  > .05) were detected between rotation frequencies of 5 and 36 rpm. We conclude that the fertilizing capacity of stallion semen was negatively affected by rotation during storage in vitro, irrespective of the rotation frequency. Further studies need to investigate whether field fertility in horses is similarly affected by semen rotation on roller benches in vivo.