Determining Optimal Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: Clinical Decision Tree Algorithm

• Published in: Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) Vol. 129; no. 1; pp. 130 - 138
• Main Authors: Schmitt, Jennifer J, Carranza Leon, Daniel A, Occhino, John A, Weaver, Amy L, Dowdy, Sean C, Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N, Pasupathy, Kalyan S, Gebhart, John B
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved 01.01.2017
• Subjects: Adult; Algorithms; Clinical Decision-Making - methods; Decision Trees; Female; Genital Diseases, Female - surgery; Hospital Costs; Humans; Hysterectomy - adverse effects; Hysterectomy - economics; Hysterectomy - methods; Hysterectomy - statistics & numerical data; Hysterectomy, Vaginal - adverse effects; Hysterectomy, Vaginal - economics; Hysterectomy, Vaginal - statistics & numerical data; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Organ Size; Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects; Robotic Surgical Procedures - economics; Robotic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology; Urinary Tract Infections - etiology; Uterus - pathology
• ISSN: 0029-7844; 1873-233X
• DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001756

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate practice change after initiation of a robotic surgery program using a clinical algorithm to determine the optimal surgical approach to benign hysterectomy. METHODS:A retrospective postrobot cohort of benign hysterectomies (2009–2013) was identified and the expected surgical route was determined from an algorithm using vaginal access and uterine size as decision tree branches. We excluded the laparoscopic hysterectomy route. A prerobot cohort (2004–2005) was used to evaluate a practice change after the addition of robotic technology (2007). Costs were estimated. RESULTS:Cohorts were similar in regard to uterine size, vaginal parity, and prior laparotomy history. In the prerobot cohort (n=473), 320 hysterectomies (67.7%) were performed vaginally and 153 (32.3%) through laparotomy with 15.1% (46/305) performed abdominally when the algorithm specified vaginal hysterectomy. In the postrobot cohort (n=1,198), 672 hysterectomies (56.1%) were vaginal; 390 (32.6%) robot-assisted; and 136 (11.4%) abdominal. Of 743 procedures, 38 (5.1%) involved laparotomy and 154 (20.7%) involved robotic technique when a vaginal approach was expected. Robotic hysterectomies had longer operations (141 compared with 59 minutes, P<.001) and higher rates of surgical site infection (4.7% compared with 0.2%, P<.001) and urinary tract infection (8.1% compared with 4.1%, P=.05) but no difference in major complications (P=.27) or readmissions (P=.27) compared with vaginal hysterectomy. Algorithm conformance would have saved an estimated $800,000 in hospital costs over 5 years. CONCLUSION:When a decision tree algorithm indicated vaginal hysterectomy as the route of choice, vaginal hysterectomy was associated with shorter operative times, lower infection rate, and lower cost. Vaginal hysterectomy should be the route of choice when feasible.