An empirical survey on prevalence and demographic differences in academic dishonesty among undergraduates from four public universities in China

• Published in: Higher Education Evaluation and Development Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 52 - 65
• Main Authors: Liu, Xinjuan, Alias, Noryati
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bingley Emerald Publishing Limited 19.05.2023; Emerald Group Publishing Limited; Emerald Publishing
• Subjects: Academic dishonesty; Academic misconduct; Age Differences; Asian students; Behavior; Business Education; Cheating; Chinese undergraduates; College English; College students; Demographic difference; Dishonesty; Engineering; Engineering Education; Ethics; Foreign Countries; Gender Differences; Higher education; Incidence; Intellectual Disciplines; Learning; Learning Processes; Plagiarism; Polls & surveys; Public Colleges; Student Attitudes; Student Behavior; Technology Education; Undergraduate Students; Universities; University students; China; United States > US; Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Chinese undergraduates; Demographic difference
• ISSN: 2514-5789; 2514-5797
• DOI: 10.1108/HEED-11-2021-0081

PurposeThis empirical survey is conducted to investigate the prevalence rate of academic dishonesty (AD) in examinations and assignments among undergraduates. The study compared the difference in admitted behaviours of academic dishonesty between male and female students comprising second-year, third-year and fourth-year students from the discipline of business, engineering, information technology (IT) and education.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional study was utilized in this study and collected data via the online questionnaire. A total of 1,624 respondents participated from four public universities of four provinces in China Mainland.FindingsThe findings showed that the proportion of respondents from China participating in AD is between 15.4 and 51.7%. The findings showed that more than two-thirds of the respondents stated involved dishonesty in examinations and assignments at least once during the previous academic year. In addition, male and female undergraduates in second-year, third-year and fourth-year showed statistically significant differences in dishonest behaviours. Specifically, the male/senior students were more involved in dishonest behaviours than the females/sophomores.Originality/valueUnlike previous studies, this study found that discipline in the Chinese context was not a significant demographic predictor of dishonesty. Although not significantly different, the respondents majoring in business reported a high engagement rate of dishonesty, followed by engineering and information technology undergraduates, but education undergraduates revealed the lowest engagement rate of dishonesty. The target integrity education should be imparted among male and senior students.