A Novel Adaptive Undersampling Framework for Class-Imbalance Fault Detection

Class-imbalance is a prevalent and challenging problem in the field of fault detection. The undersampling ensemble framework is an effective method to deal with imbalance problems. However, designing a suitable sampling strategy to generate effective and divergent subsets is a major difficulty of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on reliability Vol. 72; no. 3; pp. 1 - 15
Main Authors Qian, Min, Li, Yan-Fu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.09.2023
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Class-imbalance is a prevalent and challenging problem in the field of fault detection. The undersampling ensemble framework is an effective method to deal with imbalance problems. However, designing a suitable sampling strategy to generate effective and divergent subsets is a major difficulty of this type of method. Hence, we propose a novel adaptive undersampling framework. It models the entire training process as a Markov decision process (MDP), thus, enabling dynamic decision-making for subsequent sampling strategies based on the current training performance of the ensemble framework. The sampler is optimized by the soft actor-critic reinforcement learning method. Considering the imbalance dataset's nature and the need for state definition, the clustering method is applied to the original training dataset. The state (training performance) and the action (sampling strategy) are determined according to the clustering results. The unique state definition and sampling decision mechanism are designed to ensure the convergence speed of MDP and improve the divergence of the subsets. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework on the real-world wind turbine blade cracking datasets and the high-speed train braking system dataset. The experimental results show that the classification performance and robustness of the proposed framework are significantly better than the 16 benchmark methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0018-9529
1558-1721
DOI:10.1109/TR.2022.3214519