Elastic response of colloidal smectic liquid crystals: Insights from microscopic theory

Elongated colloidal rods at sufficient packing conditions are known to form stable lamellar or smectic phases. Using a simplified volume-exclusion model, we propose a generic equation of state for hard-rod smectics that is robust against simulation results and is independent of the rod aspect ratio....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysical review. E Vol. 107; no. 5-1; p. 054604
Main Authors Wensink, H H, Grelet, E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.05.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Elongated colloidal rods at sufficient packing conditions are known to form stable lamellar or smectic phases. Using a simplified volume-exclusion model, we propose a generic equation of state for hard-rod smectics that is robust against simulation results and is independent of the rod aspect ratio. We then extend our theory by exploring the elastic properties of a hard-rod smectic, including the layer compressibility (B) and bending modulus (K_{1}). By introducing weak backbone flexibility we are able to compare our predictions with experimental results on smectics of filamentous virus rods (fd) and find quantitative agreement between the smectic layer spacing, the out-of-plane fluctuation strength, as well as the smectic penetration length λ=sqrt[K_{1}/B]. We demonstrate that the layer bending modulus is dominated by director splay and depends sensitively on lamellar out-of-plane fluctuations that we account for on the single-rod level. We find that the ratio between the smectic penetration length and the lamellar spacing is about two orders of magnitude smaller than typical values reported for thermotropic smectics. We attribute this to the fact that colloidal smectics are considerably softer in terms of layer compression than their thermotropic counterparts while the cost of layer bending is of comparable magnitude.
ISSN:2470-0053
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.107.054604