Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection in evaluation of cN0 neck in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Systematic review and meta-analysis study

The sentinel node biopsy concept has been gaining popularity in the head and neck cancer literature and several pilot studies have been published. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cN0 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the ora...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEgyptian journal of ear, nose, throat and allied sciences Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 25 - 34
Main Authors Hassan, Ossama, Taha, Mohamed shehata, El Mehairy, Hazem
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cairo, Egypt Elsevier B.V 01.03.2015
Egyptian Society of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The sentinel node biopsy concept has been gaining popularity in the head and neck cancer literature and several pilot studies have been published. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cN0 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE from 1980 to 2014 by combining oral cavity and oropharyngeal SCC keywords with sentinel node biopsy keywords. We included diagnostic accuracy studies which used neck dissection as a reference test for the sentinel node biopsy. Study characteristics and measures of accuracy were extracted. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated from 2×2 tables. A total of 35 studies (1121 patients) were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 93%, 100%, 35.89%, .12%, 282.7%, 100%, 97% and 97.8%, respectively. High sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy of SLNB support its role as a valid diagnostic technique to correctly stage cN0 patients with OCSCC and OPSCC.
ISSN:2090-0740
2090-3405
DOI:10.1016/j.ejenta.2014.10.001