Speaking of feelings affects, language, and psychoanalysis

For a surprising number of analysands, many with above-average intelligence and facility with language, words do not adequately capture or convey emotion or symbolize experience. This often subtle difficulty can have a powerful impact on the ability to verbally communicate emotions, process affect,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychoanalytic dialogues Vol. 8; no. 5; pp. 685 - 705
Main Author Barth, F. Diane
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.01.1998
Laurence Erlbaum Associates
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For a surprising number of analysands, many with above-average intelligence and facility with language, words do not adequately capture or convey emotion or symbolize experience. This often subtle difficulty can have a powerful impact on the ability to verbally communicate emotions, process affect, and utilize traditional psychoanalytic interventions. Analysands with these problems therefore often have difficulty using analysis to explore and understand their own experience, yet the reasons for such difficulties are often not recognized by either analyst or analysand. In this article, I suggest that the concept of alexithymia can provide a valuable tool for understanding this gap between affects and language and, in its broadest interpretation, can aid therapists in their pursuit of meaningful approaches to the analytic process. Using the concept as a starting point, I describe and illustrate an approach in which paying attention to apparently insignificant aspects of an analysand's experience gradually helps analysands identify and explore personal symbols and meanings in their lives.
ISSN:1048-1885
1940-9222
DOI:10.1080/10481889809539283