Shared Group Memberships Mitigate Intergroup Bias in Cooperation
Research on cooperation between groups tends to consider a single social identity at a time. However, individuals naturally share group membership in one social category (e.g., religious belief) while diverging in membership to others (e.g., political ideology). Here, we test the effects of mixed-gr...
Saved in:
Published in | Social psychological & personality science |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
13.11.2023
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Research on cooperation between groups tends to consider a single social identity at a time. However, individuals naturally share group membership in one social category (e.g., religious belief) while diverging in membership to others (e.g., political ideology). Here, we test the effects of mixed-group membership on actual cooperative behavior relative to completely sharing (in-group) and completely diverging (out-group) group memberships. In three high-powered, preregistered, and incentivized experiments, we found evidence for our hypotheses that cooperation increases with the number of shared memberships in arbitrary (Experiment 1, N = 292) as well as naturally existing social categories such as political orientation and ethnicity (Experiment 2, N = 501) or political orientation and religious affiliation (Experiment 3, N = 292). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1948-5506 1948-5514 |
DOI: | 10.1177/19485506231209788 |