Performance comparison between ceramic Ce:GAGG and single crystal Ce:GAGG with digital-SiPM

The Gd sub(3) Al sub(2) Ga sub(3) O sub(12)(Ce:GAGG) is a new inorganic scintillator known for its attractive properties such as high light yield, stopping power and relatively fast decay time. In this study, we fabricated a ceramic Ce:GAGG scintillator as a cost-effective alternative to single crys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of instrumentation Vol. 12; no. 1; p. P01002
Main Authors Park, C., Kim, C., Kim, J., Lee, Y., Lee, K., Yeom, J.Y.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 02.01.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Gd sub(3) Al sub(2) Ga sub(3) O sub(12)(Ce:GAGG) is a new inorganic scintillator known for its attractive properties such as high light yield, stopping power and relatively fast decay time. In this study, we fabricated a ceramic Ce:GAGG scintillator as a cost-effective alternative to single crystal Ce:GAGG and, for the first time, investigated their performances when coupled to the digital silicon photomultiplier (dSiPM)-a new type of photosensor designed for applications in medical imaging, high energy and astrophysics. Compared to 3 x 3 x 2 mm super(3) sized single crystal Ce:GAGG, the translucent ceramic Ce:GAGG, which has a much lower transmittance than the single crystal, was determined to give an output signal amplitude that is approximately 61% of single crystal Ce:GAGG. The energy resolution of the 511 keV annihilation peak of a super(22) Na source was measured to be 9.9 + or - 0.2% and 13.0 + or - 0.3% for the single and ceramic scintillators respectively. On the other hand, the coincidence resolving time (CRT) of ceramic Ce:GAGG was 307 + or - 23 ps, better than the 465 + or - 37 ps acquired with single crystals-probably attributed to its slightly faster decay time and higher proportion of the fast decay component. The ceramic Ce:GAGG may be a promising cost-effective candidate for applications that do not require thick scintillators such as x-ray detectors and charged particle detectors, and those that require time-of-flight capabilities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1748-0221
1748-0221
DOI:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01002