Performance comparison between ceramic Ce:GAGG and single crystal Ce:GAGG with digital-SiPM
The Gd sub(3) Al sub(2) Ga sub(3) O sub(12)(Ce:GAGG) is a new inorganic scintillator known for its attractive properties such as high light yield, stopping power and relatively fast decay time. In this study, we fabricated a ceramic Ce:GAGG scintillator as a cost-effective alternative to single crys...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of instrumentation Vol. 12; no. 1; p. P01002 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
02.01.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The Gd sub(3) Al sub(2) Ga sub(3) O sub(12)(Ce:GAGG) is a new inorganic scintillator known for its attractive properties such as high light yield, stopping power and relatively fast decay time. In this study, we fabricated a ceramic Ce:GAGG scintillator as a cost-effective alternative to single crystal Ce:GAGG and, for the first time, investigated their performances when coupled to the digital silicon photomultiplier (dSiPM)-a new type of photosensor designed for applications in medical imaging, high energy and astrophysics. Compared to 3 x 3 x 2 mm super(3) sized single crystal Ce:GAGG, the translucent ceramic Ce:GAGG, which has a much lower transmittance than the single crystal, was determined to give an output signal amplitude that is approximately 61% of single crystal Ce:GAGG. The energy resolution of the 511 keV annihilation peak of a super(22) Na source was measured to be 9.9 + or - 0.2% and 13.0 + or - 0.3% for the single and ceramic scintillators respectively. On the other hand, the coincidence resolving time (CRT) of ceramic Ce:GAGG was 307 + or - 23 ps, better than the 465 + or - 37 ps acquired with single crystals-probably attributed to its slightly faster decay time and higher proportion of the fast decay component. The ceramic Ce:GAGG may be a promising cost-effective candidate for applications that do not require thick scintillators such as x-ray detectors and charged particle detectors, and those that require time-of-flight capabilities. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1748-0221 1748-0221 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01002 |