Citizen Bodies, Intersex Citizenship
The aim of this article is to assess the use of sexual citizenship and intimate citizenship in articulating a concept of ‘intersex citizenship’. Intersex activism diverges in important ways from feminist, queer, lesbian and gay, and trans activism. Nevertheless, concepts of sexual and intimate citiz...
Saved in:
Published in | Sexualities Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 29 - 48 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi
SAGE Publications
01.02.2007
Sage |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The aim of this article is to assess the use of sexual citizenship and intimate
citizenship in articulating a concept of ‘intersex citizenship’.
Intersex activism diverges in important ways from feminist, queer, lesbian and gay,
and trans activism. Nevertheless, concepts of sexual and intimate citizenship help
in thinking about the effects of family and kin structures on intersex corporeality,
the impact of new technologies on intersex activism, and the advantages and
disadvantages of consumer citizenship models for intersex claims, amongst other
factors. As long as intersex issues are defined by medically disciplining
techniques, there remains a need to think critically about how citizenship norms are
constructed through responses to corporeality. Carol Lee Bacchi and Chris
Beasley's concept of ‘citizen bodies’ provides a useful
starting point both in attempting to theorize the norms underlying the
hyper-embodiment of intersexual subjects, and in relating this hyper-embodiment to
the construction of intersexual people as non-citizens. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1363-4607 1461-7382 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1363460707072951 |