Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 19; no. 9; p. 5747
• Main Authors: La Verde, Marco, De Franciscis, Pasquale, Torre, Clelia, Celardo, Angela, Grassini, Giulia, Papa, Rossella, Cianci, Stefano, Capristo, Carlo, Morlando, Maddalena, Riemma, Gaetano
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 09.05.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Accuracy; Birth weight; Body mass index; Cesarean section; Childbirth & labor; Diabetes mellitus; Fetuses; Gestational diabetes; Maneuvers; Observational studies; Obstetrics; Parameters; Pregnancy; Risk factors; Shoulder; Thorax; Ultrasonic imaging; Vagina; delivery; fetal macrosomia; fetal biacromial diameter; ultrasound fetal biacromial diameter; fetal ultrasound biometry; shoulder dystocia
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095747

Shoulder dystocia (ShD) is one of most dangerous obstetric complication. The objective of this study was to determine if the ultrasonographic fetal biacromial diameter (BA) and derived parameters could predict ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary care university hospital from March 2021 to February 2022. We included all full-term pregnancies accepted for delivery that received an accurate ultrasonography (USG) scan before delivery. USG biometry and estimated fetal weight (EFW) were collected. Therefore, we evaluated the diameter of the mid-arm, the transverse thoracic diameter (TTD) and the biacromial diameter (BA). BA was estimated using Youssef's formula: TTD + 2 mid-arm diameters. The primary outcome was the evaluation of BA and its related parameters (BA/biparietal diameter (BPD), BA/head circumference (HC) and BA-BPD in fetuses with ShD versus fetuses without ShD. Diagnostic accuracy for ShD of BA, BA/BPD, BA/HC and BA-BPD was evaluated using receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis. 90 women were included in the analysis, four of these had ShD and required extra maneuvers after head delivery. BA was increased in fetuses with ShD (150.4 cm; 95% CI 133.2 cm to 167.6 cm) compared to no-ShD (133.5 cm; 95% CI 130.1 cm to 137.0 cm; = 0.04). Significant differences were also found between ShD and no-ShD groups for BA/BPD (1.66 (95% CI 1.46 to 1.86) vs. 1.44 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.48); = 0.04), BA/HC (0.45 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.49) vs. 0.39 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.40); = 0.01), BA-BPD (60.0 mm (95% CI 42.4 to 77.6 cm) vs. 41.4 (95% CI 38.2 to 44.6); = 0.03), respectively. ROC analysis showed an overall good accuracy for ShD, with an AUC of 0.821 ( = 0.001) for BA alone and 0.881 ( = 0.001), 0.857 ( = 0.016) and 0.867 ( = 0.013) for BA/BPD, BA-BPD and BA/HC, respectively. BA alone, as well as BA/BPD, BA/HC and BA-BPD might be useful predictors of ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. However, such evidence needs extensive confirmation by means of additional studies with large sample sizes, especially in case of pregnancies at high risk for ShD (i.e., gestational diabetes).