Adolescent and young adult long-acting reversible contraception post-insertion visit attendance before and after COVID-19

• Published in: International journal of adolescent medicine and health Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 55 - 60
• Main Authors: Bryson, Amanda E., Milliren, Carly E., Borzutzky, Claudia, Golub, Sarah A., Pitts, Sarah A. B., DiVasta, Amy D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany De Gruyter 01.02.2024; Walter de Gruyter GmbH
• Subjects: Adolescent; Birth control; Contraceptive Agents; COVID-19; Humans; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception; Pandemics; Telemedicine; United States - epidemiology; Young Adult; Young adults; United States; United States > US; telemedicine; adolescent; young adult; long-acting reversible contraception
• ISSN: 2191-0278; 0334-0139; 2191-0278
• DOI: 10.1515/ijamh-2023-0134

Widespread use of telemedicine for contraceptive care, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), was adopted in the United States in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the rapid implementation of these services, little is known about the use of telemedicine for adolescent and young adult (AYA) contraceptive care. This study examined the routine use of telemedicine for LARC post-insertion care by comparing visit attendance between AYAs receiving LARC before and after the COVID-19 pandemic onset. This analysis included LARC insertions 3/1/19-11/30/19 (pre-pandemic onset cohort) and 4/1/20-12/31/20 (post-pandemic onset cohort) from three Adolescent Medicine subspecialty clinics in the United States. De-identified data were collected via review of the electronic health record. Descriptive statistics, χ tests, and t-tests described and compared groups. Adjusted logistic regression models examined factors associated with attending a post-insertion visit and attending this visit via telemedicine. This analysis included 525 LARC insertions (279 pre- and 246 post-pandemic onset). The proportion of AYAs attending a post-insertion visit increased after the COVID-19 pandemic onset (pre 30 % vs. post 46 %; p≤0.001). Adjusted models revealed that the post-pandemic onset cohort was nearly twice as likely to attend a post-insertion visit as the pre-pandemic onset cohort (OR=1.90; 95 % CI=1.68-2.15). Of those attending this visit in the post-pandemic onset cohort (n=112), 42 % utilized telemedicine. AYAs were more likely to attend post-insertion visits after the COVID-19 pandemic onset than before. Telemedicine may have influenced this change in visit attendance.