OASIS 2: Mobility differences with specific prosthetic feet across procedure codes

• Published in: Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering Vol. 9; pp. 205566832211016 - 20556683221101623
• Main Authors: Miller, Taavy A, Campbell, James H., England, Dwiesha L., Stevens, Phillip M., Wurdeman, Shane R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2022; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Feet; Generalized linear models; Mobility; Original Manuscript; Prostheses; Rehabilitation; mobility; prosthetic feet; prosthesis foot type; outcomes; amputees
• ISSN: 2055-6683; 2055-6683
• DOI: 10.1177/20556683221101623

Introduction Recently, many prosthetic devices were subjected to reimbursement coding review. Several prosthetic feet that were historically coded with the shock-attenuating function were recoded. The purpose of this analysis was to compare patient-reported functional mobility across a range of prosthetic feet using real-world clinical outcomes data. Methods A retrospective, observational review. A univariate generalized linear model was used to assess mobility across foot categories and between different prosthetic feet coded as L5987 or L5981. Results The final sample analyzed comprised of 526 individuals and four mutually exclusive categories of feet examined across a total of 10 different prosthetic foot types. The comparison of prosthetic foot categories were significantly different from the control category (i.e. historically L5981). Conclusions The current data suggest the development of some prosthetic foot designs using advanced materials and geometric designs can provide comparable functional benefits as those with distinct shock absorbing mechanical features. Emphasizing functional performance over visible features may be a pathway towards higher performance for the end user.