Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs): Do they have a role in the care of the critically ill patient?

Over an eight-month period, 177 patients were admitted to a study to determine whether there was any significant difference between the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in relation to the central venous catheter (CVC) and the peripheral venous access device in respect of the length of s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIntensive & critical care nursing Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 37 - 47
Main Authors Griffiths, Vivien R., Philpot, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2002
Subjects
Aged
APACHE
Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects
Catheterization, Central Venous - methods
Catheters, Indwelling
Critical Illness
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Nursing
Phlebitis - etiology
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Over an eight-month period, 177 patients were admitted to a study to determine whether there was any significant difference between the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in relation to the central venous catheter (CVC) and the peripheral venous access device in respect of the length of stay, incidence of phlebitis and the need for removal for suspected sepsis and infection. The results demonstrated no significant difference in terms of gender, age, or severity of illness. The PICC line had a significally higher length of stay and less incidence of phlebitis. In conclusion, PICC placement does have a place in the critical care setting. It should not be expected to replace existing methods of vascular access but used to provide a safe and effective alternative
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0964-3397
1532-4036
DOI:10.1054/iccn.2002.1615