Technical assessment in minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision: Is the complete mesocolic excision competency assessment tool valid and reliable?

• Published in: Colorectal disease Vol. 25; no. 11; pp. 2139 - 2146
• Main Authors: Haug, Tora Rydtun, Ørntoft, Mai‐Britt Worm, Miskovic, Danilo, Iversen, Lene Hjerrild, Johnsen, Søren Paaske, Valentin, Jan Brink, Gómez Ruiz, Marcos, Benz, Stefan, Eeg Storli, Kristian, Stearns, Adam T., Madsen, Anders Husted
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2023
• Subjects: Laparoscopy; Skills; Surgeons; Surgery; Training; Training level; Validation studies; Validity
• ISSN: 1462-8910; 1463-1318
• DOI: 10.1111/codi.16756

Abstract Aim The complete mesocolic excision competency assessment tool (CMECAT) is a novel tool designed to assess technical skills in minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision (CME) surgery. The aim of this study was to assess construct validity and reliability of CMECAT in a clinical context. Method Colorectal surgeons were asked to submit video recorded laparoscopic CME resections for independent assessment of their technical abilities. The videos were grouped by surgeons' training level, and four established CME experts were recruited as CMECAT assessors. Extended reliability analysis (G‐theory) was applied to describe assessor agreement. Results A total of 19 videos and 72 assessments were included in the analysis. Overall, technical skills assessed by CMECAT improved with increased training level: the experts scored significantly better than the untrained surgeons (3.3 vs. 2.5 points; p  < 0.01). On right‐sided resections, significantly higher scores were reported with increased training level for all categories and sections, while for left‐sided resections, the variance across groups was smaller and significantly higher scores were only reported for oncological safety describing items. Overall, assessor agreement was high (G‐coefficient: 0.81). Conclusion This study confirms that CMECAT can be applied to video recorded CME cases for technical skill assessment. Further, it can reliably assess technical performance in right sided CME surgery, where construct validity has now been established. More videos are required to evaluate its validity on left colonic CME. In the future, we hope CMECAT can improve feedback during CME training, serve as a tool in certification processes and contribute to distinguishing CME from conventional surgery in future research.