Design and evaluation of a set of methodological strategies for learning a second language in students with Down Syndrome using Computer-Based Instruction
This paper introduces a set of teaching strategies to enhance second language learning for students with Down Syndrome (DS) enrolled in an English course covering material from the first two years of Primary School. A set of instructional support strategies have been defined and integrated into an o...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE transactions on learning technologies Vol. 17; pp. 1 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Piscataway
IEEE
01.01.2024
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1939-1382 2372-0050 |
DOI | 10.1109/TLT.2023.3242170 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This paper introduces a set of teaching strategies to enhance second language learning for students with Down Syndrome (DS) enrolled in an English course covering material from the first two years of Primary School. A set of instructional support strategies have been defined and integrated into an online learning software, developed ad-hoc to teach the basic vocabulary of the English subject syllabus of the two first courses of Primary School. A controlled experiment was carried out with 20 students with DS, who were divided into two groups: control and experimental. The control group was given a simplified version of the software, while the experimental group had access to the complete software with personalized instruction. Prior to the experiment, all participants undertook the same level test (pre-test) in order to assess their initial knowledge level of English. After finishing the learning stage, a post-test was provided to the students to assess their learning. In both groups, results in the post-test were consistently better than in the pre-test, supporting the positive effect of the learning software as an instructional tool. In addition, learning gains were significantly higher in the experimental group, that used the proposed instructional aids. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1939-1382 2372-0050 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TLT.2023.3242170 |