‘Goats that stare at men’—revisited: do dwarf goats alter their behaviour in response to eye visibility and head direction of a human?

• Published in: Animal cognition Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 667 - 672
• Main Authors: Nawroth, Christian, von Borell, Eberhard, Langbein, Jan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2016; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Animal cognition; Animals; Attention; Behavioral Sciences; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Cues; Eye; Female; Goats; Goats - psychology; Head; Humans; Life Sciences; Male; Orientation; Posture; Psychology Research; Short Communication; Visual perception; Zoology; Eye visibility; Food anticipation paradigm; Head orientation; Dwarf goats; Social cognition
• ISSN: 1435-9448; 1435-9456; 1435-9456
• DOI: 10.1007/s10071-016-0957-6

Being able to recognise when one is being observed by someone else is thought to be adaptive during cooperative or competitive events. In particular for prey species, this ability should be of use in the context of predation. A previous study reported that goats ( Capra aegagrus hircus ) alter their behaviour according to the body and head orientation of a human experimenter. During a food anticipation task, an experimenter remained in a particular posture for 30 s before delivering a reward, and the goats’ active anticipation and standing alert behaviour were analysed. To further evaluate the specific mechanisms at work, we here present two additional test conditions. In particular, we investigated the effects of the eye visibility and head orientation of a human experimenter on the behaviour of the goats ( N  = 7). We found that the level of the subjects’ active anticipatory behaviour was highest in the conditions where the experimenter was directing his head and body towards the goat (‘Control’ and ‘Eyes closed’ conditions), but the anticipatory behaviour was significantly decreased when the body (‘Head only’) or the head and body of the experimenter were directed away from the subject (‘Back’ condition). For standing alert, we found no significant differences between the three conditions in which the experimenter was directing his head towards the subject (‘Control’, ‘Eyes closed’ and ‘Head only’). This lack of differences in the expression of standing alert suggests that goats evaluate the direction of a human’s head as an important cue in their anticipatory behaviour. However, goats did not respond to the visibility of the experimenter’s eyes alone.