Direct Yet Opposite Effects of Stress-related and Mindful Eating on Diet Quality

Examine the relationships among dietary quality, mindful eating, and constructs of the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. In this cross-sectional study, women (n = 67) aged 25–50 years, with a body mass index of 25–40 kg/m2 completed 3 days of 24-hour recalls and a survey that included the Pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of nutrition education and behavior Vol. 54; no. 9; pp. 872 - 877
Main Authors Knol, Linda L., Crowe-White, Kristi M., Appel, Susan J., Daquin, Jane C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Examine the relationships among dietary quality, mindful eating, and constructs of the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. In this cross-sectional study, women (n = 67) aged 25–50 years, with a body mass index of 25–40 kg/m2 completed 3 days of 24-hour recalls and a survey that included the Perceived Stress Scale, Eating and Appraisal Due to Emotions and Stress Questionnaire, and the Mindful Eating Questionnaire. Structural equation modeling assessed relationships among all constructs with the dependent variable, the Healthy Eating Index–2015. Mindful Eating Questionnaire (β = 0.60, P = 0.001) and Emotion and Stress-related Eating scores from Eating and Appraisal Due to Emotions and Stress Questionnaire (β = −0.69, P < 0.001) (r2 = 0.50) were directly associated with Healthy Eating Index–2015, but no indirect effects were identified. Overall dietary quality is associated with greater mindful eating but more emotion and stress-related eating scores among women who were overweight or obese. Future studies could assess model constructs using other diet quality scores and including additional coping mechanisms such as substance use, physical activity, and meditation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1499-4046
1878-2620
DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2022.04.006