Espionage, the First Amendment, and the Case Against Julian Assange
In May 2019, a federal grand jury returned an eighteen-count criminal indictment against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Charges include conspiring to obtain national defense information, obtaining and disclosing national defense information, and conspiring to gain unauthorized access to a governm...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of intelligence and counterintelligence Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 747 - 767 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Philadelphia
Routledge
01.10.2020
Taylor & Francis LLC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In May 2019, a federal grand jury returned an eighteen-count criminal indictment against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Charges include conspiring to obtain national defense information, obtaining and disclosing national defense information, and conspiring to gain unauthorized access to a government computer network. All but one of the counts allege violations of the Espionage Act, World War I--era legislation enacted to protect sensitive information and safeguard national security. Assange is currently serving a 50-week sentence in the UK for violating the conditions of his bail in an unrelated case. An extradition hearing is scheduled for Feb 2020 in response to a formal request submitted by the US. The prosecution of Assange has reignited a fierce and long-standing debate over the publication of classified information and limitations to First Amendment protections. A successful conviction would be precedent-setting. Prior prosecutions have focused almost exclusively on government insiders and their initial disclosure, rather than any subsequent release to the public. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0885-0607 1521-0561 |
DOI: | 10.1080/08850607.2020.1716431 |