The "Peculiarities" Of Modernisation In Korea: Revisiting The Debate On "Colonial Modernisation" Vs. "Colonial Plunder"

This article revisits the "colonial modernisation" thesis and its nationalist critique, the thesis of "colonial plunder" in the context of Korea. The two accounts have long been subject to politically charged disputes: while the former posits a causal link between Japanese coloni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of contemporary Asia Vol. 52; no. 4; pp. 628 - 652
Main Author Song, Hae-Yung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 08.08.2022
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0047-2336
1752-7554
DOI10.1080/00472336.2021.1953110

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article revisits the "colonial modernisation" thesis and its nationalist critique, the thesis of "colonial plunder" in the context of Korea. The two accounts have long been subject to politically charged disputes: while the former posits a causal link between Japanese colonialism and Korea's rapid industrialisation, the latter suggests that Korea's transition to capitalist development was blocked and distorted by Japanese colonialism. This article offers a critique of both accounts at the theoretical and historical levels. For a theoretical critique, it draws on the Marxist discussions of the notion of the "peculiarities" of national capitalism with reference to Britain and Germany. The article argues that both theses, by deriving the presumed ills or virtues of Korean capitalism from Japanese colonialism, assume the existence of a "normal" and "benign" path to capitalism and look at Korean capitalism and Japanese colonialism in isolation from the universal contradictions emanating from their being integral to the capitalist world-system. For a historical critique, this article assesses the dissolution of Chosŭn Korea at the turn of the twentieth century and the formation of the Korean capitalist class and shows that Korea's transition to capitalism was both an inherently global process and driven by violent class struggles.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0047-2336
1752-7554
DOI:10.1080/00472336.2021.1953110