Radiofrequency energy delivery to the gastroesophageal junction for the treatment of GERD

Background: In this multi-center study, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery to the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were investigated. Methods: Forty-seven patients with classic symptoms of GERD (hear...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGastrointestinal endoscopy Vol. 53; no. 4; pp. 407 - 415
Main Authors Triadafilopoulos, George, DiBaise, John K., Nostrant, Timothy T., Stollman, Neil H., Anderson, Paul K., Edmundowicz, Steven A., Castell, Donald O., Kim, Michael S., Rabine, John C., Utley, David S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.04.2001
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: In this multi-center study, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery to the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were investigated. Methods: Forty-seven patients with classic symptoms of GERD (heartburn and/or regurgitation), a daily anti-secretory medication requirement, and at least partial symptom response to drugs were enrolled. All patients had pathologic esophageal acid exposure by 24-hour pH study, a 2 cm or smaller hiatal hernia, grade 2 or less esophagitis, and no significant dysmotility or dysphagia. RF energy was delivered with a catheter and thermocouple-controlled generator to create submucosal thermal lesions in the muscle of the GEJ. GERD symptoms and quality of life were assessed at 0, 1, 4, and 6 months with the short-form health survey (SF-36). Anti-secretory medications were withdrawn 7 days before each assessment of symptoms and pH/motility study. Medication use, endoscopic findings, esophageal acid exposure, and motility were assessed at 0 and 6 months. Results: Thirty-two men and 15 women underwent treatment. At 6 months there were improvements in the median heartburn score (4 to 1, p ≤ 0.0001), GERD score (26 to 7, p ≤ 0.0001), satisfaction (1 to 4, p ≤ 0.0001), mental SF-36 (46.2 to 55.5, p = 0.01), physical SF-36 (41.1 to 51.9, p ≤ 0.0001), and esophageal acid exposure (11.7% to 4.8%, p ≤ 0.0001). Esophagitis was present in 25 patients before treatment (15 grade 1 and 10 grade 2) and 8 had esophagitis at 6 months (4 grade 1 and 4 grade 2, p = 0.005). At 6 months, 87% no longer required proton pump inhibitor medication. There was no significant change in median lower esophageal sphincter pressure (14.0 to 12.0 mm Hg, p = 0.19), peristaltic amplitude (64 to 66 mm Hg, p = 0.71), or lower esophageal sphincter length (3.0 to 3.0, p = 0.28). There were 3 self-limited complications (fever for 24 hours, odynophagia lasting for 5 days, and a linear mucosal injury that was healed after 3 weeks). Conclusion: RF energy delivery significantly improved GERD symptoms, quality of life, and esophageal acid exposure while eliminating the need for anti-secretory medication in the majority of patients with a heterogeneous spectrum of clinical disease severity but with minimal active esophagitis or hiatal hernia. (Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:407-15.)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1067/mge.2001.112843