Youth mentoring with a balanced focus, shared purpose, and collaborative interactions

This opening article defines the ways in which three mentoring interaction elements—focus, purpose, and authorship—distinguish between effective and ineffective mentoring relationship styles. The framework described can help mentors better understand the difference between prescriptive and instrumen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNew directions for youth development Vol. 2010; no. 126; pp. 13 - 32
Main Authors Karcher, Michael J., Nakkula, Michael J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2010
Jossey-Bass
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This opening article defines the ways in which three mentoring interaction elements—focus, purpose, and authorship—distinguish between effective and ineffective mentoring relationship styles. The framework described can help mentors better understand the difference between prescriptive and instrumental styles and differentiate laissez‐faire from developmental mentoring. It also reveals unique ways for program staff to develop training materials and for researchers to better study mentoring activities. The authors suggest that being able to articulate the importance of focus, purpose, and authorship is critical for shaping program practices, designing relevant research, and guiding program evaluations.
Bibliography:ArticleID:YD347
ark:/67375/WNG-DRZX9ZWW-Z
istex:834204D1B50B381B6B401A9472C6125F7F040035
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1533-8916
1537-5781
DOI:10.1002/yd.347