Amitriptyline effectiveness in burning mouth syndrome: An in-depth case series analysis

To assess the effectiveness of amitriptyline (AMT), and to identify the determinants of the treatment's effectiveness in patients diagnosed with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). Treatment of BMS is challenging and no established treatment protocol is available. AMT may be an important treatment op...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGerodontology
Main Authors Gonçalves, Douglas Rodrigues, Botelho, Leonardo Monteiro, Carrard, Vinícius Coelho, Martins, Marco Antônio Trevizani, Visioli, Fernanda
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 21.03.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess the effectiveness of amitriptyline (AMT), and to identify the determinants of the treatment's effectiveness in patients diagnosed with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). Treatment of BMS is challenging and no established treatment protocol is available. AMT may be an important treatment option, cout not all patients benefit from this drug. Studies assessing factors related to treatment response are valuable in improving decision-making. This case series study examined the medical records of all patients diagnosed with BMS at an oral medicine unit in a university hospital from 2008 to 2022. The patients were divided into responders to AMT and non-responders to AMT. Data on demographic information, comorbidities, medications, types of symptoms and oral subsites affected were collected. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association between the independent variables and the outcome, using the Chi-squared test (P < .05). Three hundred and fourty-nine patients reported a burning mouth sensation, 50 of them (14.3%) being diagnosed with primary BMS. Of these, 35 were treated with AMT, and 26 (74.2%) responded significantly to AMT. All males responded to AMT, whereas only 67.9% of females responded. The mean dose of AMT among responders was 29.8 ± 12.3 mg, with most patients achieving a response with 25 mg (61.5% of patients), followed by 50 mg (23%). The concomitant use of an anticonvulsant resulted in non-response. AMT may be effective in BMS management for most patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0734-0664
1741-2358
DOI:10.1111/ger.12750