Corollary discharge function in healthy controls: Evidence about self‐speech and external speech processing

Abstract As we speak, corollary discharge mechanisms suppress the auditory conscious perception of the self‐generated voice in healthy subjects. This suppression has been associated with the attenuation of the auditory N1 component. To analyse this corollary discharge phenomenon (agency and ownershi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European journal of neuroscience Vol. 58; no. 7; pp. 3705 - 3713
Main Authors Beño‐Ruiz‐de‐la‐Sierra, Rosa M., Arjona‐Valladares, Antonio, Fondevila Estevez, Sabela, Fernández‐Linsenbarth, Inés, Díez, Álvaro, Molina, Vicente
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract As we speak, corollary discharge mechanisms suppress the auditory conscious perception of the self‐generated voice in healthy subjects. This suppression has been associated with the attenuation of the auditory N1 component. To analyse this corollary discharge phenomenon (agency and ownership), we registered the event‐related potentials of 42 healthy subjects. The N1 and P2 components were elicited by spoken vowels ( talk condition; agency), by played‐back vowels recorded with their own voice ( listen‐self condition; ownership) and by played‐back vowels recorded with an external voice ( listen‐other condition). The N1 amplitude elicited by the talk condition was smaller compared with the listen‐self and listen‐other conditions. There were no amplitude differences in N1 between listen‐self and listen‐other conditions. The P2 component did not show differences between conditions. Additionally, a peak latency analysis of N1 and P2 components between the three conditions showed no differences. These findings corroborate previous results showing that the corollary discharge mechanisms dampen sensory responses to self‐generated speech (agency experience) and provide new neurophysiological evidence about the similarities in the processing of played‐back vowels with our own voice (ownership experience) and with an external voice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0953-816X
1460-9568
DOI:10.1111/ejn.16125