DEVELOPING PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR THE SDWA REGULATORY PROGRAM: MELDING what's countable with what counts

Considerable interest exists among water supply professionals in how well public health protections are generated by the federal drinking water regulatory program as administered under the US Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) Safe Drinking Water Act. This interest is heightened b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal - American Water Works Association Vol. 98; no. 4; pp. 82 - 90
Main Authors RAUCHER, ROBERT S., ROBERSON, J. ALAN, HARROD, MEGAN
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Denver American Water Works Association 01.04.2006
Subjects
Business metrics
Cancer
Chemical hazards
Compliance
Costs
Data Collection
Drinking water
Effectiveness
Estimates
Federal regulation
Federal Regulations
Food law
Government agencies
Health outcomes
Illnesses
Medical profession
Monitoring
Nitrates
Perchlorates
Performance evaluation
Performance metrics
Potable water
Public Health
Regulatory agencies
regulatory update
Safe Drinking Water Act
Toxicity
Urinary bladder
United States > US
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Considerable interest exists among water supply professionals in how well public health protections are generated by the federal drinking water regulatory program as administered under the US Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) Safe Drinking Water Act. This interest is heightened because of Office of Management and Budget pressure on federal agencies to develop common performance measures to track the progress of every regulatory program. It is challenging to devise clear, meaningful measures of progress for public sector entities such as the USEPA's federal drinking water regulatory program. Limitations are inherent in the relevant public health data, and it is difficult to attribute any observable trend in public health statistics to drinking water or other possible causal agents. In addition, performance measures that are easily countable may steer results in the wrong direction, whereas indicators that are more oriented toward the ultimate desired outcomes (e.g., better health) may be uncountable or not easily interpreted. This article offers a useful perspective on performance indicators and recommends ideas for how such indicators might be applied to the drinking water regulatory program for defining the monitoring and related data collection requirements.
ISSN:0003-150X
1551-8833
DOI:10.1002/j.1551-8833.2006.tb07636.x