Human factors considerations in distance simulation: A nominal group technique application
Introduction The pandemic‐driven surge in global distance simulation (DS) adoption highlighted the need for effective educator training. A literature search identified the gap regarding human factors (HF) considerations for the professional development of DS practitioners. This study addresses this...
Saved in:
Published in | The clinical teacher Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. e13724 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
01.08.2024
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Introduction
The pandemic‐driven surge in global distance simulation (DS) adoption highlighted the need for effective educator training. A literature search identified the gap regarding human factors (HF) considerations for the professional development of DS practitioners. This study addresses this gap by applying HF principles to guide educators in developing and delivering evidence‐based DS.
Methods
This was a consensus‐gathering, three‐phase study using the nominal group technique (NGT) in the first phase, qualitative thematic analysis with member checking in the second phase and external expert opinion in the third. A dichotomised approach was used to divide the post‐consensus discussion survey results into an agreement and non‐agreement for quantitative analysis.
Results
The results of the quantitative analysis identified the following needs: developing a conceptual framework for DS, tailoring the technical aspect to the educational objectives, investigating learner engagement, training faculty at an earlier stage and identifying at‐risk students. Qualitative results identified primary themes of technology, people and outcome measurements. Key aspects of technology were identified as system‐ and programme‐fit and resource considerations. Outcome measurement highlights the need for increased measurement and research at all levels of DS.
Discussion
Specific HF focal points include human–technology interaction and learning outcome assessment within the DS context. Incorporating HF principles throughout the DS process, from inception to outcome evaluation, promises substantial benefits for both learners and educators. This approach empowers both learners and educators, fostering a dynamic and enriched educational environment and improved learning experiences. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information isabel.gross@yale.edu Penni I Watts, PhD, RN, CHSE‐A, FSSH, FAAN, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing mancini@uta.edu Maria Bajwa and Anne Herx‐Weaver are first co‐authors. No funding was available for this study. bdamazo@csuchico.edu Mary Beth Mancini, RN, Ph.D., NE‐BC, FAHA, ANEF, FSSH, FAAN, Professor Emeritus University of Texas Arlington, College of Nursing and Health Innovation Dawn Wawersik Ph.D., MSN, RN, CHSE, CNE‐cl, Henry Ford College Dearborn, MI dmwawersik@hfcc.edu Byline authors Becky Damazo, RN, CPNP, CHSE‐A, MSN, Professor Emeritus, California State University, Chico piwatts@uab.edu Isabel Theresia Gross, MD, Ph.D., MPH, Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1743-4971 1743-498X 1743-498X |
DOI: | 10.1111/tct.13724 |