Ertapenem blood concentration: A retrospective cohort study to analyse risk of neurotoxicity

Aims Several cases of ertapenem‐related neurotoxicity have been published in the current literature. However, studies evaluating the ertapenem blood concentration (EBC) as a risk of these adverse events are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the trough EBC and the risk of neurolog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 89; no. 9; pp. 2843 - 2850
Main Authors Campany‐Herrero, David, Pau‐Parra, Alba, González‐Moreno, Pablo, Vima‐Bofarull, Jaume, Anguita‐Domingo, Danae, Montoro‐Ronsano, Bruno
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims Several cases of ertapenem‐related neurotoxicity have been published in the current literature. However, studies evaluating the ertapenem blood concentration (EBC) as a risk of these adverse events are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the trough EBC and the risk of neurological toxicity. Methods This was a retrospective study, including patients who underwent ertapenem treatment between October 2019 and February 2021. We excluded patients in the critical care unit and those whose blood samples were not properly taken in order to analyse ertapenem trough concentration. We also excluded patients whose clinical follow‐up was not properly realized for the entire period of ertapenem treatment. The main outcome was the presence of any suspicious neurological side effect owing to ertapenem administration and its relationship with the plasma concentration. Secondary outcomes were to identify clinical and analytical data contributing to a higher risk of neurotoxicity. Results The initial cohort comprised 158 individuals. For the final analysis we evaluated 102 patients, reporting a neurological alteration in 13/102 (12.7%). Mean trough EBC was significantly higher in patients showing neurotoxicity in comparison with those who did not (37.8 mcg mL−1, standard deviation [SD] ± 35.7 vs. 14.6 mcg mL−1, SD ± 15.2; P = .002). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, EBC (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07; P = .006), a moderate renal insufficiency (OR = 9.2; P = .02) and a history of previous neurologic disease (OR = 9.9; P = .02) were identified as risk factors of neurological alteration during ertapenem treatment. Conclusions In patients at risk, determining the ertapenem plasma concentration may help to minimize the risk of neurotoxicity.
Bibliography:Funding information
The authors confirm that the Principal Investigator for this paper is David Campany‐Herrero and that he had direct clinical responsibility for patients.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not‐for‐profit sectors.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/bcp.15782