The more the better?: the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on in-hospital mortality following colorectal resection

To determine the in-hospital mortality rates for patients undergoing colorectal resection for malignant or benign conditions, and to identify risk factors for in-hospital death, particularly the relationships with surgeon and hospital volume. Although there is strong evidence that complex cancer ope...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of surgery Vol. 249; no. 6; p. 954
Main Authors Karanicolas, Paul J, Dubois, Luc, Colquhoun, Patrick H D, Swallow, Carol J, Walter, Stephen D, Guyatt, Gordon H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.06.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine the in-hospital mortality rates for patients undergoing colorectal resection for malignant or benign conditions, and to identify risk factors for in-hospital death, particularly the relationships with surgeon and hospital volume. Although there is strong evidence that complex cancer operations are best performed at specialized high-volume centers and by high-volume surgeons, the relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and perioperative outcomes is less well defined for more common procedures such as colorectal resections, particularly for benign diseases. We obtained data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database on all adult patients who underwent colorectal resection between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2006. We performed a logistic regression to identify variables associated with a higher likelihood of in-hospital death. Twenty-one thousand seventy-four patients underwent colorectal resection, with the majority being elective (59.4%). Malignancy represented the most common indication for resection (56.8%), followed by diverticular disease (16.2%) and inflammatory bowel disease (7.1%). The overall in-hospital mortality rate among patients undergoing colorectal resection was 5.3%. Increased age (adjusted Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.97 per 10 years, P < 0.001), urgent operation (OR: 2.63, P < 0.001), indication for resection (P < 0.001), nature of the surgery (P < 0.001), and several comorbidities were all independently associated with an increased risk of death. Surgeons with higher volumes of colorectal resections achieved significantly lower mortality rates (OR: 0.92 per 20 cases/y, P = 0.003), corresponding to an adjusted mortality rate of 5.6% for surgeons in the bottom decile (1 case per year) compared with 4.5% for surgeons in the top decile (greater than 43 cases per year). Hospital volume was not associated with mortality (OR: 1.00 per 10 cases, P = 0.504). This large, population-based study suggests that surgeons who perform high volumes of colorectal resections achieve lower in-hospital mortality rates than surgeons with low volumes, whereas the hospital volume does not influence mortality.
ISSN:1528-1140
DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77bcd